Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Peter Kobelt vs Paul Valsecchi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kobelt vs Valsecchi analysis and find out who is favored!
Peter Kobelt vs Paul Valsecchi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kobelt 1 - 0 Valsecchi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kobelt has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Valsecchi has won 54.82%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kobelt, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Valsecchi has won 51.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kobelt has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Valsecchi has saved 62.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kobelt has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Valsecchi winning 55.56% (W/L 15/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kobelt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 158/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Valsecchi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 6/ 15).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kobelt winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kobelt winning 2 and Valsecchi winning 0. The last match between Kobelt and Valsecchi was at the M25 Saint Dizier, 05-11-2019, Q3, I.hard with Peter Kobelt getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kobelt and Valsecchi have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kobelt winning 0 times and Valsecchi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kobelt winning 1, and Valsecchi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kobelt has played against opponents with an average rank of while Valsecchi has played against players with an average rank of 84.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kobelt has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Valsecchi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kobelt has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Valsecchi has converted 42.47% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
332
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
62% (216-131)
Career Total W/L
47% (102-117)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
67% (12-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Peter Kobelt | Paul Valsecchi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:0 | 1:33:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (39/59) | 67% (56/84) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (32/39) | 68% (38/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 75% (15/20) | 50% (14/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 17% (2/12) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (32/84) | 20% (12/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-4 |
Stats 
Peter Kobelt
Player
Paul Valsecchi
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
13
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
12 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Peter Kobelt | Paul Valsecchi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (12/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 68% (26/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (199/153) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 69% (11/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 35 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 20 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:4:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 126.78 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (429/730) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (278/429) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (165/301) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (31/73) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (276/689) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (12/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (12/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Peter Kobelt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Ribeiro Marcondes
Player
Peter Kobelt
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
6-7(4) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Peter Kobelt
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Kobelt
Player
Uisung Park
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
67 of
117)
13
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
117)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(10) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Kobelt
Player
Sean Hodkin
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Kobelt
Player
Alexandar Lazarov
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(2) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexandar Lazarov
Player
Peter Kobelt
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Kobelt
Player
Uisung Park
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
9
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Schott
Player
Peter Kobelt
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
2
Aces
23
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
23 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Brugnerotto
Player
Peter Kobelt
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
10
Aces
13
8
Double Faults
3
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
105
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Valsecchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mateus Alves
Player
Paul Valsecchi
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Valsecchi
Player
Joaquim Almeida
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Luis Ferraz Sandoval Carvalho
Player
Paul Valsecchi
46%
(
28 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Paul Valsecchi
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
9
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Valsecchi
Player
Juan Sebastian Osorio
44%
(
35 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Valsecchi
Player
Jose Pereira
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Valsecchi
Player
Matheus Cury Bueres
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
81%
(
59 of
73)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
11 of
14)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Kobelt Vs Valsecchi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
